TY - GEN
T1 - A Comparison of YOLO and Mask R-CNN for Segmenting Head and Tail of Fish
AU - Prasetyo, Eko
AU - Suciati, Nanik
AU - Fatichah, Chastine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 IEEE.
PY - 2020/11/10
Y1 - 2020/11/10
N2 - The visual appearance of the fish's head and tail can be used to identify its freshness. A segmentation method that can well isolate those certain parts from a fish body is required for further analysis in a system for detecting fish freshness automatically. In this research, we investigated the performance of two CNN-based segmentation methods, namely YOLO and Mask R-CNN, for separating the head and tail of fish. We retrained the YOLO and Mask R-CNN pre-trained models on the Fish-gres dataset consisting of images with high variability in the background, illumination, and overlapping objects. The experiment on 200 images containing 724 heads and 585 tails annotated manually indicated that both models work optimally. YOLO's performance was slightly better than Mask R-CNN, shown by 98.96% and 96.73% precision, and 80.93% and 75.43% recall, respectively. The experimental result also revealed that YOLO outperforms Mask R-CNN with mAP of 80.12% and 73.39%, respectively.
AB - The visual appearance of the fish's head and tail can be used to identify its freshness. A segmentation method that can well isolate those certain parts from a fish body is required for further analysis in a system for detecting fish freshness automatically. In this research, we investigated the performance of two CNN-based segmentation methods, namely YOLO and Mask R-CNN, for separating the head and tail of fish. We retrained the YOLO and Mask R-CNN pre-trained models on the Fish-gres dataset consisting of images with high variability in the background, illumination, and overlapping objects. The experiment on 200 images containing 724 heads and 585 tails annotated manually indicated that both models work optimally. YOLO's performance was slightly better than Mask R-CNN, shown by 98.96% and 96.73% precision, and 80.93% and 75.43% recall, respectively. The experimental result also revealed that YOLO outperforms Mask R-CNN with mAP of 80.12% and 73.39%, respectively.
KW - Mask R-CNN
KW - YOLO
KW - fish freshness
KW - head and tail of fish
KW - object detection
KW - segmentation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099463075&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICICoS51170.2020.9299024
DO - 10.1109/ICICoS51170.2020.9299024
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85099463075
T3 - ICICoS 2020 - Proceeding: 4th International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences
BT - ICICoS 2020 - Proceeding
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 4th International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences, ICICoS 2020
Y2 - 10 November 2020 through 11 November 2020
ER -