TY - JOUR
T1 - A Hybrid Adaptively Modified Firefly and Differential Evolution in DG Integration Optimization for Improving the Radial Power Distribution Networks
AU - Sujono,
AU - Priyadi, Ardyono
AU - Pujiantara, Margo
AU - Purnomo, Mauridhi Hery
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© (2023), (Intelligent Network and Systems Society). All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - This paper discusses optimizing DG location and size to reduce power loss and bus voltage deviation index in a 51-bus radial distribution network. Optimization of DG placement uses the firefly algorithm, and optimization of DG size uses the differential evolution (DE) algorithm. The results showed that the optimal locations were on buses 16, 45, and 15, with the highest sensitivity indices of 0.6667, 0.0612, and 0.0601. DG at a lagging power factor of 0.95 gives optimal results with sizes of 358.5157, 500.0000, and 499.9781 kW. Active and reactive power loss reduction is 44.6948% and 66.7038% of the system’s power loss without DG. In optimizing DG placement, AMFA converges faster than DE, GA, and ICA. In the case of DG size optimization, the DE algorithm converges quicker and gives the most optimal results with a fitness value of 0.12385 which is smaller than the FA, GA, and ICA algorithms.
AB - This paper discusses optimizing DG location and size to reduce power loss and bus voltage deviation index in a 51-bus radial distribution network. Optimization of DG placement uses the firefly algorithm, and optimization of DG size uses the differential evolution (DE) algorithm. The results showed that the optimal locations were on buses 16, 45, and 15, with the highest sensitivity indices of 0.6667, 0.0612, and 0.0601. DG at a lagging power factor of 0.95 gives optimal results with sizes of 358.5157, 500.0000, and 499.9781 kW. Active and reactive power loss reduction is 44.6948% and 66.7038% of the system’s power loss without DG. In optimizing DG placement, AMFA converges faster than DE, GA, and ICA. In the case of DG size optimization, the DE algorithm converges quicker and gives the most optimal results with a fitness value of 0.12385 which is smaller than the FA, GA, and ICA algorithms.
KW - Differential evolution
KW - Distributed generation
KW - Loss reduction
KW - Modified firefly
KW - Optimal capacity
KW - Voltage deviation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85170411500&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.22266/ijies2023.1031.13
DO - 10.22266/ijies2023.1031.13
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85170411500
SN - 2185-310X
VL - 16
SP - 138
EP - 148
JO - International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems
JF - International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems
IS - 5
ER -