TY - JOUR
T1 - A Multicriteria Approach for Ship Bunkering System
AU - Fini,
AU - Artana, K. B.
AU - Puspitasari, N. W.D.
AU - Kusuma, G. J.
AU - Wiraguna, D. S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - This research aims to enhance maritime fuel supply's efficiency, safety, and sustainability by advocating for the standardization of bunkering systems in ports. Through the application of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), this study assesses three primary bunkering methods: Ship to Ship, Truck to Ship, and Onshore to Ship. The criteria for evaluation encompass safety, economic factors, operational efficiency, technical considerations, and additional relevant aspects. Stakeholder feedback underscores the significance of safety (0.281) and economic (0.274) criteria, eclipsing operational (0.274), technical (0.137), and other factors (0.033) in importance. The findings prominently advocate for the Onshore to Ship method as the superior option for standardization in principal ports, marked by a value of 0.480, with Truck to Ship and Ship to Ship methods trailing in preference. Sensitivity analysis reinforces the stability of this outcome, indicating that adjustments in criteria weightings scarcely affect the overall conclusion, thereby affirming the Onshore to Ship method's predominance. This method, characterized by a pipeline connecting the jetty to ships, holds considerable potential for both research and practical applications in port logistics.
AB - This research aims to enhance maritime fuel supply's efficiency, safety, and sustainability by advocating for the standardization of bunkering systems in ports. Through the application of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), this study assesses three primary bunkering methods: Ship to Ship, Truck to Ship, and Onshore to Ship. The criteria for evaluation encompass safety, economic factors, operational efficiency, technical considerations, and additional relevant aspects. Stakeholder feedback underscores the significance of safety (0.281) and economic (0.274) criteria, eclipsing operational (0.274), technical (0.137), and other factors (0.033) in importance. The findings prominently advocate for the Onshore to Ship method as the superior option for standardization in principal ports, marked by a value of 0.480, with Truck to Ship and Ship to Ship methods trailing in preference. Sensitivity analysis reinforces the stability of this outcome, indicating that adjustments in criteria weightings scarcely affect the overall conclusion, thereby affirming the Onshore to Ship method's predominance. This method, characterized by a pipeline connecting the jetty to ships, holds considerable potential for both research and practical applications in port logistics.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85214004913&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1755-1315/1423/1/012017
DO - 10.1088/1755-1315/1423/1/012017
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85214004913
SN - 1755-1307
VL - 1423
JO - IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
JF - IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
IS - 1
M1 - 012017
T2 - 4th Maritime Safety International Conference, MASTIC 2024
Y2 - 25 August 2024 through 28 August 2024
ER -