Aggregation and coalition formation on value-based decision

Christiono Utomo; Arazi Idrus; Madzlan Napiah; Mohd Faris Khamidi

doi:10.1109/MCDM.2009.4938838

Aggregation and coalition formation on value-based decision

Christiono Utomo^*, Arazi Idrus, Madzlan Napiah, Mohd Faris Khamidi

^*Corresponding author for this work

Universiti Teknologi Petronas

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Value-based decision is very complicated since many parties involved. Where a number of stakeholders are involved in choosing a single alternative from a set of solution alternatives, there are different concern caused by differing preferences, experiences, and background. Therefore, a negotiation is required to enable each stakeholder to evaluate and rank the solution alternatives before engaging into negotiation with the other stakeholders. Decision techniques applied to determine the relative value of the alternative solutions for performing the function. The results demonstrate a comparison of aggregation and coalition formation in a multi criteria group decision and negotiation. It further emphasizes the importance of performance evaluation in the design process and value-based decision.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, MCDM 2009 - Proceedings
Pages	118-125
Number of pages	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/MCDM.2009.4938838
Publication status	Published - 2009
Externally published	Yes
Event	2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, MCDM 2009 - Nashville, TN, United States Duration: 30 Mar 2009 → 2 Apr 2009

Publication series

Name	2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, MCDM 2009 - Proceedings

Conference

Conference	2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, MCDM 2009
Country/Territory	United States
City	Nashville, TN
Period	30/03/09 → 2/04/09

Access to Document

10.1109/MCDM.2009.4938838

Cite this

Utomo, C., Idrus, A., Napiah, M., & Khamidi, M. F. (2009). Aggregation and coalition formation on value-based decision. In 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, MCDM 2009 - Proceedings (pp. 118-125). Article 4938838 (2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, MCDM 2009 - Proceedings). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCDM.2009.4938838

@inproceedings{e078fe4a976c4e2e8d6a43d2324214b4,

title = "Aggregation and coalition formation on value-based decision",

abstract = "Value-based decision is very complicated since many parties involved. Where a number of stakeholders are involved in choosing a single alternative from a set of solution alternatives, there are different concern caused by differing preferences, experiences, and background. Therefore, a negotiation is required to enable each stakeholder to evaluate and rank the solution alternatives before engaging into negotiation with the other stakeholders. Decision techniques applied to determine the relative value of the alternative solutions for performing the function. The results demonstrate a comparison of aggregation and coalition formation in a multi criteria group decision and negotiation. It further emphasizes the importance of performance evaluation in the design process and value-based decision.",

author = "Christiono Utomo and Arazi Idrus and Madzlan Napiah and Khamidi, {Mohd Faris}",

year = "2009",

doi = "10.1109/MCDM.2009.4938838",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781424427642",

series = "2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, MCDM 2009 - Proceedings",

pages = "118--125",

booktitle = "2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, MCDM 2009 - Proceedings",

note = "2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, MCDM 2009 ; Conference date: 30-03-2009 Through 02-04-2009",

}

Utomo, C, Idrus, A, Napiah, M & Khamidi, MF 2009, Aggregation and coalition formation on value-based decision. in 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, MCDM 2009 - Proceedings., 4938838, 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, MCDM 2009 - Proceedings, pp. 118-125, 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, MCDM 2009, Nashville, TN, United States, 30/03/09. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCDM.2009.4938838

Aggregation and coalition formation on value-based decision. / Utomo, Christiono; Idrus, Arazi; Napiah, Madzlan et al.
2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, MCDM 2009 - Proceedings. 2009. p. 118-125 4938838 (2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, MCDM 2009 - Proceedings).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Aggregation and coalition formation on value-based decision

AU - Utomo, Christiono

AU - Idrus, Arazi

AU - Napiah, Madzlan

AU - Khamidi, Mohd Faris

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Value-based decision is very complicated since many parties involved. Where a number of stakeholders are involved in choosing a single alternative from a set of solution alternatives, there are different concern caused by differing preferences, experiences, and background. Therefore, a negotiation is required to enable each stakeholder to evaluate and rank the solution alternatives before engaging into negotiation with the other stakeholders. Decision techniques applied to determine the relative value of the alternative solutions for performing the function. The results demonstrate a comparison of aggregation and coalition formation in a multi criteria group decision and negotiation. It further emphasizes the importance of performance evaluation in the design process and value-based decision.

AB - Value-based decision is very complicated since many parties involved. Where a number of stakeholders are involved in choosing a single alternative from a set of solution alternatives, there are different concern caused by differing preferences, experiences, and background. Therefore, a negotiation is required to enable each stakeholder to evaluate and rank the solution alternatives before engaging into negotiation with the other stakeholders. Decision techniques applied to determine the relative value of the alternative solutions for performing the function. The results demonstrate a comparison of aggregation and coalition formation in a multi criteria group decision and negotiation. It further emphasizes the importance of performance evaluation in the design process and value-based decision.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650565651&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/MCDM.2009.4938838

DO - 10.1109/MCDM.2009.4938838

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:67650565651

SN - 9781424427642

T3 - 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, MCDM 2009 - Proceedings

SP - 118

EP - 125

BT - 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, MCDM 2009 - Proceedings

T2 - 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, MCDM 2009

Y2 - 30 March 2009 through 2 April 2009

ER -

Utomo C, Idrus A, Napiah M, Khamidi MF. Aggregation and coalition formation on value-based decision. In 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, MCDM 2009 - Proceedings. 2009. p. 118-125. 4938838. (2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, MCDM 2009 - Proceedings). doi: 10.1109/MCDM.2009.4938838

Aggregation and coalition formation on value-based decision

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this