TY - JOUR
T1 - AHP-TOPSIS for analyzing job performance with factor evaluation system and process mining
AU - Sophia, Gabriel
AU - Sarno, Riyanarto
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan.
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - Job performance is a type of assessments which refers to scalable actions, behaviour and outcomes that employees engage in or bring out linked with and contribute to organizational goals.This research employed the Factor Evaluation System (FES) method to analyze the job performance due to the common usage of the method. In analyzing employees, FES consists of nine factors; however, those nine factors are considered to be insufficient. Hence, the researchers used the process mining method to improve FES. Process mining analyzes job performance in details. The steps taken in process mining consist of time stamp, case, activity, and resources of employee. This means that the method can be continuously used, since the researcher provides weight for each factor. The weight of each factor is obtained from Analytic Hierarchy Process-Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution. The result shows that FES with process mining are good for job performance but AHP-TOPSIS is considered to be incompatible for usage compared to the real work because the priority of the FES factors from the method is inconsistent with the priority factor made by manager of the warehouse officer.
AB - Job performance is a type of assessments which refers to scalable actions, behaviour and outcomes that employees engage in or bring out linked with and contribute to organizational goals.This research employed the Factor Evaluation System (FES) method to analyze the job performance due to the common usage of the method. In analyzing employees, FES consists of nine factors; however, those nine factors are considered to be insufficient. Hence, the researchers used the process mining method to improve FES. Process mining analyzes job performance in details. The steps taken in process mining consist of time stamp, case, activity, and resources of employee. This means that the method can be continuously used, since the researcher provides weight for each factor. The weight of each factor is obtained from Analytic Hierarchy Process-Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution. The result shows that FES with process mining are good for job performance but AHP-TOPSIS is considered to be incompatible for usage compared to the real work because the priority of the FES factors from the method is inconsistent with the priority factor made by manager of the warehouse officer.
KW - AHP-TOPSIS
KW - Factor evaluation system
KW - Job performance
KW - Process mining
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069038172&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.12928/TELKOMNIKA.v17i3.10408
DO - 10.12928/TELKOMNIKA.v17i3.10408
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85069038172
SN - 1693-6930
VL - 17
SP - 1344
EP - 1351
JO - Telkomnika (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control)
JF - Telkomnika (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control)
IS - 3
ER -