TY - GEN
T1 - Algorithm Adaptation Methods for Prediction of Opinion and Exceptions in Financial Statements Audit Reports
T2 - 2024 Beyond Technology Summit on Informatics International Conference, BTS-I2C 2024
AU - Butar, Thio Marta Elisa Yuridis Butar
AU - Saikhu, Ahmad
AU - Fatichah, Chastine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Prior research on financial statement audits has mostly employed multi-label classification, like the Problem Transformation Methods, and single-label classification, such as opinion prediction, identification, and detection. Using information from financial statement audit reports in the Riau Islands province, we suggest applying multi-label classification to predict 'opinion and exceptions.' We employ opinion and exceptions as labels and financial ratios as attributes. Back-Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) and Deep Back-Propagation Neural Network (DBPNN), two Algorithm Adaptation Methods, are employed in this study. Two Algorithm Adaptation Methods are computed using two model architectures, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and Voted Perceptron (VP). For Hamming Loss (HL), One Error (OE), Rank Loss (RL), and Average Precision (AP), the best evaluation metric outcomes are 0.0417, 0.0000, 0.0333, and 0.9786, respectively.
AB - Prior research on financial statement audits has mostly employed multi-label classification, like the Problem Transformation Methods, and single-label classification, such as opinion prediction, identification, and detection. Using information from financial statement audit reports in the Riau Islands province, we suggest applying multi-label classification to predict 'opinion and exceptions.' We employ opinion and exceptions as labels and financial ratios as attributes. Back-Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) and Deep Back-Propagation Neural Network (DBPNN), two Algorithm Adaptation Methods, are employed in this study. Two Algorithm Adaptation Methods are computed using two model architectures, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and Voted Perceptron (VP). For Hamming Loss (HL), One Error (OE), Rank Loss (RL), and Average Precision (AP), the best evaluation metric outcomes are 0.0417, 0.0000, 0.0333, and 0.9786, respectively.
KW - algorithm adaptation methods
KW - audit reports
KW - financial ratios
KW - financial statements
KW - multi-label classification
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105003265171
U2 - 10.1109/BTS-I2C63534.2024.10941888
DO - 10.1109/BTS-I2C63534.2024.10941888
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105003265171
T3 - 2024 Beyond Technology Summit on Informatics International Conference, BTS-I2C 2024
SP - 101
EP - 106
BT - 2024 Beyond Technology Summit on Informatics International Conference, BTS-I2C 2024
A2 - Wibowo, Ferry Wahyu
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Y2 - 19 December 2024
ER -