TY - JOUR
T1 - Anomaly detection on flight route using similarity and grouping approach based-on automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast
AU - Pusadan, Mohammad Yazdi
AU - Buliali, Joko Lianto
AU - Ginardi, Raden Venantius Hari
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/11
Y1 - 2019/11
N2 - Flight anomaly detection is used to determine the abnormal state data on the flight route. This study focused on two groups: general aviation habits (C1) and anomalies (C2). Groups C1 and C2 are obtained through similarity test with references. The methods used are: 1) normalizing the training data form, 2) forming the training segment 3) calculating the log-likelihood value and determining the maximum log-likelihood (C1) and minimum log-likelihood (C2) values, 4) determining the percentage of data based on criteria C1 and C2 by grouping SVM, KNN, and K-means and 5) Testing with log-likelihood ratio. The results achieved in each segment are Log-likelihood value in C1Latitude is-15.97 and C1Longitude is-16.97. On the other hand, Log-likelihood value in C2Latitude is-19.3 (maximum) and-20.3 (minimum), and log-likelihood value in C2Longitude is-21.2 (maximum) and-24.8 (minimum). The largest percentage value in C1 is 96%, while the largest in C2 is 10%. Thus, the highest potential anomaly data is 10%, and the smallest is 3%. Also, there are performance tests based on F-measure to get accuracy and precision.
AB - Flight anomaly detection is used to determine the abnormal state data on the flight route. This study focused on two groups: general aviation habits (C1) and anomalies (C2). Groups C1 and C2 are obtained through similarity test with references. The methods used are: 1) normalizing the training data form, 2) forming the training segment 3) calculating the log-likelihood value and determining the maximum log-likelihood (C1) and minimum log-likelihood (C2) values, 4) determining the percentage of data based on criteria C1 and C2 by grouping SVM, KNN, and K-means and 5) Testing with log-likelihood ratio. The results achieved in each segment are Log-likelihood value in C1Latitude is-15.97 and C1Longitude is-16.97. On the other hand, Log-likelihood value in C2Latitude is-19.3 (maximum) and-20.3 (minimum), and log-likelihood value in C2Longitude is-21.2 (maximum) and-24.8 (minimum). The largest percentage value in C1 is 96%, while the largest in C2 is 10%. Thus, the highest potential anomaly data is 10%, and the smallest is 3%. Also, there are performance tests based on F-measure to get accuracy and precision.
KW - Accuracy
KW - Anomaly detection
KW - Grouping similarity
KW - Log-likelihood ratio
KW - Segment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077392595&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.26555/ijain.v5i3.232
DO - 10.26555/ijain.v5i3.232
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85077392595
SN - 2442-6571
VL - 5
SP - 285
EP - 296
JO - International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics
JF - International Journal of Advances in Intelligent Informatics
IS - 3
ER -