TY - GEN
T1 - Application of Holt-Winter and Grey Holt-Winter Model in Risk Analysis of United States (US) Energy Commodities Futures Using Value at Risk (VaR)
AU - Siswono, Galuh Oktavia
AU - Saputra, Wisnowan Hendy
AU - Pricila, Verencia
AU - Lina, Yeni April
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Institute of Physics Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/12/15
Y1 - 2023/12/15
N2 - A futures contract is a derivative product in the form of an agreement that requires parties to buy or sell an underlying asset at a defined price and time in the future, which can be used as a means of hedging, speculation, or arbitrage. In this study, we utilize Holt-Winter and Grey Holt-Winter methods to model the daily closing price of the United States (US) energy commodity futures. The best model will be selected based on the lowest Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). In addition, we use Value at Risk (VaR) to assess risk. We took four energy commodities futures in the United States (US) as a sample, such as Natural Gas, Gasoline RBOB, Heating Oil, and Crude Oil. We suppose that the data has a pattern consisting of trend and seasonality. The stationarity test is used to prove this, showing the rejection of the hypothesis. Based on the study, the best model for all futures commodities is Holt-Winter because it has a lower MAPE value than Grey Holt-Winter. This paper concludes that, based on VaR, the energy-futures with the lowest risk is Heating Oil while the highest risk is Natural Gas.
AB - A futures contract is a derivative product in the form of an agreement that requires parties to buy or sell an underlying asset at a defined price and time in the future, which can be used as a means of hedging, speculation, or arbitrage. In this study, we utilize Holt-Winter and Grey Holt-Winter methods to model the daily closing price of the United States (US) energy commodity futures. The best model will be selected based on the lowest Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). In addition, we use Value at Risk (VaR) to assess risk. We took four energy commodities futures in the United States (US) as a sample, such as Natural Gas, Gasoline RBOB, Heating Oil, and Crude Oil. We suppose that the data has a pattern consisting of trend and seasonality. The stationarity test is used to prove this, showing the rejection of the hypothesis. Based on the study, the best model for all futures commodities is Holt-Winter because it has a lower MAPE value than Grey Holt-Winter. This paper concludes that, based on VaR, the energy-futures with the lowest risk is Heating Oil while the highest risk is Natural Gas.
KW - Energy
KW - Grey Holt-Winter Model
KW - Holt-Winter
KW - Value at Risk
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180327290&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1063/5.0177467
DO - 10.1063/5.0177467
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85180327290
T3 - AIP Conference Proceedings
BT - AIP Conference Proceedings
A2 - Sambas, Aceng
A2 - Sukono, null
A2 - Vaidyanathan, Sundarapandian
PB - American Institute of Physics Inc.
T2 - 2nd International Conference on Applied Sciences, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, ICASTEM 2021
Y2 - 2 November 2021 through 3 November 2021
ER -