TY - GEN
T1 - CFD simulation of pulse combustion's performance
AU - Rahmatika, Annie Mufyda
AU - Widiyastuti, W.
AU - Winardi, Sugeng
AU - Nurtono, Tantular
AU - Machmudah, Siti
AU - Kusdianto,
AU - Joni, I. Made
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 AIP Publishing LLC.
PY - 2016/2/24
Y1 - 2016/2/24
N2 - This study aims to show changes in the performance of combustion using pulse combustion at specified intervals using simulation. Simulations is performed using Computational Fluid Dynamics analysis (CFD) software Ansys Fluent 15.0. Analysis used 2D illustration axisymmetric with k-ε turbulence models. Propane was selected as fuel at a flow rate of 15?L/min. Air with flow rate of 375?L/min is used as oxidizer. To investigate the advantages of using pulse combustion, the simulated pulse combustion is compared to normal combustion without a pulse. This is done by displaying descriptions of the phenomenon, mechanisms and results output gas combustor. From the analysis of simulation results showed that in 1 minute burning time, burning fuel without requiring pulse as much as 15?L while the pulse combustion requires half of the fuel which is 12.5?L. However, the higher average of temperature was generated by pulse combustion and the amounts of unburned fuel that comes out of the combustor less than without the use of pulse combustion. So, it can be concluded that the pulse combustion is more efficient than combustion without a pulse.
AB - This study aims to show changes in the performance of combustion using pulse combustion at specified intervals using simulation. Simulations is performed using Computational Fluid Dynamics analysis (CFD) software Ansys Fluent 15.0. Analysis used 2D illustration axisymmetric with k-ε turbulence models. Propane was selected as fuel at a flow rate of 15?L/min. Air with flow rate of 375?L/min is used as oxidizer. To investigate the advantages of using pulse combustion, the simulated pulse combustion is compared to normal combustion without a pulse. This is done by displaying descriptions of the phenomenon, mechanisms and results output gas combustor. From the analysis of simulation results showed that in 1 minute burning time, burning fuel without requiring pulse as much as 15?L while the pulse combustion requires half of the fuel which is 12.5?L. However, the higher average of temperature was generated by pulse combustion and the amounts of unburned fuel that comes out of the combustor less than without the use of pulse combustion. So, it can be concluded that the pulse combustion is more efficient than combustion without a pulse.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984569860&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1063/1.4941883
DO - 10.1063/1.4941883
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84984569860
T3 - AIP Conference Proceedings
BT - 2nd Padjadjaran International Physics Symposium 2015, PIPS 2015
A2 - Panatarani, Camellia
A2 - Joni, I Made
PB - American Institute of Physics Inc.
T2 - 2nd Padjadjaran International Physics Symposium: Materials Functionalization and Energy Conservations, PIPS 2015
Y2 - 2 September 2015 through 3 September 2015
ER -