TY - GEN
T1 - Characterization of 3D printer fabrication result at the different 3D printers for radiation dosimetry
AU - Uniatunada, Isfina
AU - Hefdea, Ajeng
AU - Kurniya, Retno
AU - Amaliya, Rizki
AU - Jannah, Fathul
AU - Nisa, Fithrotun
AU - Ramadhan, Fakhrusy R.
AU - Hariyanto, Aditya P.
AU - Almira, Levina
AU - Endarko, E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Author(s).
PY - 2023/5/9
Y1 - 2023/5/9
N2 - The use of 3D printing in the medical world is snowballing. One of the advantages of the diagnostic field is to create a patient-specific phantom model in terms of its dosimetry measurements. This study aimed to compare the 3D printer results for radiation dosimetry phantom. We used three types of 3D printers for the study, namely 3D Printers Direct Ender 5 Plus, Indirect Ender 5 Plus, and CR-10 Max. The segmented stomach in STL format was then used to define dimensions and mass references as input in the Ultimaker Cura software and then printed using Polylactic Acid (PLA). The dimensions, mass, and wrapping were used to determine the physical characteristic of the phantom, whereas a CT-Scan was used to determine the phantom's Hounsfield Units (HU). The results showed that the most significant error value for mass characterization was the fabricated phantom with the 3D Phantom CR-10 Max, 0.259%. Moreover, in the dimensional and wrapping characterization, the most significant error values for Indirect Ender 5 Plus are 0.0306% and 0.079%, respectively.
AB - The use of 3D printing in the medical world is snowballing. One of the advantages of the diagnostic field is to create a patient-specific phantom model in terms of its dosimetry measurements. This study aimed to compare the 3D printer results for radiation dosimetry phantom. We used three types of 3D printers for the study, namely 3D Printers Direct Ender 5 Plus, Indirect Ender 5 Plus, and CR-10 Max. The segmented stomach in STL format was then used to define dimensions and mass references as input in the Ultimaker Cura software and then printed using Polylactic Acid (PLA). The dimensions, mass, and wrapping were used to determine the physical characteristic of the phantom, whereas a CT-Scan was used to determine the phantom's Hounsfield Units (HU). The results showed that the most significant error value for mass characterization was the fabricated phantom with the 3D Phantom CR-10 Max, 0.259%. Moreover, in the dimensional and wrapping characterization, the most significant error values for Indirect Ender 5 Plus are 0.0306% and 0.079%, respectively.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160423970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1063/5.0114187
DO - 10.1063/5.0114187
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85160423970
T3 - AIP Conference Proceedings
BT - 2nd International Symposium on Physics and Applications 2021
A2 - Asih, Retno
A2 - Nasori, null
A2 - Saifuddin, null
A2 - Haekal, Muhammad
PB - American Institute of Physics Inc.
T2 - 2nd International Symposium on Physics and Applications 2021, ISPA 2021
Y2 - 13 November 2021 through 14 November 2021
ER -