Comparison of P&O and INC MPPT Performance Control for Photovoltaic Systems

Dwi Nur Fitriyanah; Imam Abadi; Ali Musyafa

doi:10.1109/CSPA68262.2026.11517636

Comparison of P&O and INC MPPT Performance Control for Photovoltaic Systems

Dwi Nur Fitriyanah^*
, Imam Abadi
, Ali Musyafa

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

Abstract

MPPT is an important component of PV systems that maximizes the extracted energy under certain environmental conditions. This study presents a comparative analysis of the performance of the P&O and INC methods on a boost converter implemented through duty cycle adjustment. The system was tested using 315 Wp PV modules under standard (1000 W/m² irradiance and 25°C temperature) and dynamic conditions. Absolute power error, MAPE, tracking efficiency, and system dynamic response. The MAPE values in standard/constant conditions are 6.6% and 13.9% using the P&O and INC methods, respectively. Meanwhile, in dynamic conditions, the MAPE values are 37.26% and 20.87% when the PNO and INC methods are used, respectively. These results show that the INC method outperforms the P&O method under dynamic conditions. The P & O method is more stable and has a smaller MAPE than the INC method under standard conditions.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	2026 22nd IEEE International Colloquium on Signal Processing and Its Applications, CSPA 2026 - Proceedings
Publisher	Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages	408-413
Number of pages	6
Volume	2026-May
Edition	2026
ISBN (Electronic)	9798331569129
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/CSPA68262.2026.11517636
Publication status	Published - 2026
Event	22nd IEEE International Colloquium on Signal Processing and Its Applications, CSPA 2026 - Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Duration: 1 May 2026 → 2 May 2026

Conference

Conference	22nd IEEE International Colloquium on Signal Processing and Its Applications, CSPA 2026
Country/Territory	Malaysia
City	Kuala Lumpur
Period	1/05/26 → 2/05/26

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

Keywords

Boost Converter
Duty Cycle Control
INC
MPPT
P&O
Photovoltaic

Access to Document

10.1109/CSPA68262.2026.11517636

Cite this

Fitriyanah, D. N., Abadi, I., & Musyafa, A. (2026). Comparison of P&O and INC MPPT Performance Control for Photovoltaic Systems. In 2026 22nd IEEE International Colloquium on Signal Processing and Its Applications, CSPA 2026 - Proceedings (2026 ed., Vol. 2026-May, pp. 408-413). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSPA68262.2026.11517636

@inproceedings{0cd7605c2eb84bd9afec22b46f5b23e5,

title = "Comparison of P\&O and INC MPPT Performance Control for Photovoltaic Systems",

abstract = "MPPT is an important component of PV systems that maximizes the extracted energy under certain environmental conditions. This study presents a comparative analysis of the performance of the P\&O and INC methods on a boost converter implemented through duty cycle adjustment. The system was tested using 315 Wp PV modules under standard (1000 W/m2 irradiance and 25°C temperature) and dynamic conditions. Absolute power error, MAPE, tracking efficiency, and system dynamic response. The MAPE values in standard/constant conditions are 6.6\% and 13.9\% using the P\&O and INC methods, respectively. Meanwhile, in dynamic conditions, the MAPE values are 37.26\% and 20.87\% when the PNO and INC methods are used, respectively. These results show that the INC method outperforms the P\&O method under dynamic conditions. The P \& O method is more stable and has a smaller MAPE than the INC method under standard conditions.",

keywords = "Boost Converter, Duty Cycle Control, INC, MPPT, P\&O, Photovoltaic",

author = "Fitriyanah, \{Dwi Nur\} and Imam Abadi and Ali Musyafa",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2026 IEEE.; 22nd IEEE International Colloquium on Signal Processing and Its Applications, CSPA 2026 ; Conference date: 01-05-2026 Through 02-05-2026",

year = "2026",

doi = "10.1109/CSPA68262.2026.11517636",

language = "English",

volume = "2026-May",

pages = "408--413",

booktitle = "2026 22nd IEEE International Colloquium on Signal Processing and Its Applications, CSPA 2026 - Proceedings",

publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

address = "United States",

edition = "2026",

}

Fitriyanah, DN , Abadi, I & Musyafa, A 2026, Comparison of P&O and INC MPPT Performance Control for Photovoltaic Systems. in 2026 22nd IEEE International Colloquium on Signal Processing and Its Applications, CSPA 2026 - Proceedings. 2026 edn, vol. 2026-May, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 408-413, 22nd IEEE International Colloquium on Signal Processing and Its Applications, CSPA 2026, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1/05/26. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSPA68262.2026.11517636

Comparison of P&O and INC MPPT Performance Control for Photovoltaic Systems. / Fitriyanah, Dwi Nur ; Abadi, Imam ; Musyafa, Ali.
2026 22nd IEEE International Colloquium on Signal Processing and Its Applications, CSPA 2026 - Proceedings. Vol. 2026-May 2026. ed. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2026. p. 408-413.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of P&O and INC MPPT Performance Control for Photovoltaic Systems

AU - Fitriyanah, Dwi Nur

AU - Abadi, Imam

AU - Musyafa, Ali

PY - 2026

Y1 - 2026

N2 - MPPT is an important component of PV systems that maximizes the extracted energy under certain environmental conditions. This study presents a comparative analysis of the performance of the P&O and INC methods on a boost converter implemented through duty cycle adjustment. The system was tested using 315 Wp PV modules under standard (1000 W/m2 irradiance and 25°C temperature) and dynamic conditions. Absolute power error, MAPE, tracking efficiency, and system dynamic response. The MAPE values in standard/constant conditions are 6.6% and 13.9% using the P&O and INC methods, respectively. Meanwhile, in dynamic conditions, the MAPE values are 37.26% and 20.87% when the PNO and INC methods are used, respectively. These results show that the INC method outperforms the P&O method under dynamic conditions. The P & O method is more stable and has a smaller MAPE than the INC method under standard conditions.

AB - MPPT is an important component of PV systems that maximizes the extracted energy under certain environmental conditions. This study presents a comparative analysis of the performance of the P&O and INC methods on a boost converter implemented through duty cycle adjustment. The system was tested using 315 Wp PV modules under standard (1000 W/m2 irradiance and 25°C temperature) and dynamic conditions. Absolute power error, MAPE, tracking efficiency, and system dynamic response. The MAPE values in standard/constant conditions are 6.6% and 13.9% using the P&O and INC methods, respectively. Meanwhile, in dynamic conditions, the MAPE values are 37.26% and 20.87% when the PNO and INC methods are used, respectively. These results show that the INC method outperforms the P&O method under dynamic conditions. The P & O method is more stable and has a smaller MAPE than the INC method under standard conditions.

KW - Boost Converter

KW - Duty Cycle Control

KW - INC

KW - MPPT

KW - P&O

KW - Photovoltaic

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105041339244

U2 - 10.1109/CSPA68262.2026.11517636

DO - 10.1109/CSPA68262.2026.11517636

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:105041339244

VL - 2026-May

SP - 408

EP - 413

BT - 2026 22nd IEEE International Colloquium on Signal Processing and Its Applications, CSPA 2026 - Proceedings

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

T2 - 22nd IEEE International Colloquium on Signal Processing and Its Applications, CSPA 2026

Y2 - 1 May 2026 through 2 May 2026

ER -

Comparison of P&O and INC MPPT Performance Control for Photovoltaic Systems

Abstract

Conference

UN SDGs

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this