11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper focuses on comparison between coplanar Vivaldi antenna, Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna (AVA) and Balance Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna (BAVA) on FR4 substrate, in the same size and type of substrate and the same opening rate of the exponential taper. The proposed antenna has overall size 1.1λ � λ � 0.016λ and works in 2-4 GHz. The best return loss has been obtained for BAVA of -47 dB at 2.374 GHz from simulated result. For overall of frequency, coplanar vivaldi antenna gets higher gain than AVA and BAVA. Directivity of coplanar Vivaldi is 7.859 dBi at 4 GHz. AVA has more asymmetric radiation pattern than BAVA. Side lobe level for coplanar Vivaldi antenna has better performance than AVA and BAVA.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - 2016 IEEE Region 10 Symposium, TENSYMP 2016
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages188-193
Number of pages6
ISBN (Electronic)9781509009312
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jul 2016
Event2016 IEEE Region 10 Symposium, TENSYMP 2016 - Bali, Indonesia
Duration: 9 May 201611 May 2016

Publication series

NameProceedings - 2016 IEEE Region 10 Symposium, TENSYMP 2016

Conference

Conference2016 IEEE Region 10 Symposium, TENSYMP 2016
Country/TerritoryIndonesia
CityBali
Period9/05/1611/05/16

Keywords

  • Antipodal
  • BAVA
  • S-Band
  • coplanar
  • vivaldi

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison study of S-Band Vivaldi-based antennas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this