TY - GEN
T1 - Developing modified PeGI indicators for e-Government Ranking method
AU - Palijama, Friana
AU - Sumpeno, Surya
AU - Wibawa, Adhi Dharma
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 IEEE.
PY - 2016/12/30
Y1 - 2016/12/30
N2 - e-Government Ranking of Indonesia (Pemeringkatan e-Government Indonesia - PeGI) is conducted in order to determine and evaluate the success of e-Government implementation nationally. However, the parameters that have been used by PeGI in evaluating government offices were too general. Some more detail exploration regarding the parameters for ranking the Government office is necessary to determine the level of PeGI in more detail and objective judgement. Due to that, this research was done to get more details indicators on PeGI ratings that can evaluate the success level of e-Government implementation in government office and also to minimize the improper assessment. In this study, the modified PeGI indicators were developed based on COBIT 5 standard. Questionnaire with detail indicators as a result of PeGI modification was used to re-rank some government offices sample. The result of ranking then being compared with the rank of current PeGI. This study resulted: 164 questions in the modified questionnaire, each on Policy Dimension (8 categories) 39 questions, Institutional Dimension (5 categories) 19 questions, Infrastructure Dimension (7 categories) 44 questions, Application Dimension (5 categories) 41 questions, and Planning Dimension (5 categories) 21 questions. In conclusion, we found that the final result of Modified PeGI ranking for Surabaya City Government was lower compared to normal PeGI ranking. Detail indicators can describe e-Government implementation in a more objective way.
AB - e-Government Ranking of Indonesia (Pemeringkatan e-Government Indonesia - PeGI) is conducted in order to determine and evaluate the success of e-Government implementation nationally. However, the parameters that have been used by PeGI in evaluating government offices were too general. Some more detail exploration regarding the parameters for ranking the Government office is necessary to determine the level of PeGI in more detail and objective judgement. Due to that, this research was done to get more details indicators on PeGI ratings that can evaluate the success level of e-Government implementation in government office and also to minimize the improper assessment. In this study, the modified PeGI indicators were developed based on COBIT 5 standard. Questionnaire with detail indicators as a result of PeGI modification was used to re-rank some government offices sample. The result of ranking then being compared with the rank of current PeGI. This study resulted: 164 questions in the modified questionnaire, each on Policy Dimension (8 categories) 39 questions, Institutional Dimension (5 categories) 19 questions, Infrastructure Dimension (7 categories) 44 questions, Application Dimension (5 categories) 41 questions, and Planning Dimension (5 categories) 21 questions. In conclusion, we found that the final result of Modified PeGI ranking for Surabaya City Government was lower compared to normal PeGI ranking. Detail indicators can describe e-Government implementation in a more objective way.
KW - Good Governance
KW - Modified PeGI
KW - PeGI
KW - SKPD ranking
KW - e-Government ranking
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011256438&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICITISEE.2016.7803068
DO - 10.1109/ICITISEE.2016.7803068
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85011256438
T3 - Proceedings - 2016 1st International Conference on Information Technology, Information Systems and Electrical Engineering, ICITISEE 2016
SP - 169
EP - 173
BT - Proceedings - 2016 1st International Conference on Information Technology, Information Systems and Electrical Engineering, ICITISEE 2016
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 1st International Conference on Information Technology, Information Systems and Electrical Engineering, ICITISEE 2016
Y2 - 23 August 2016 through 24 August 2016
ER -