TY - GEN
T1 - Economic evaluation of burner unit removal project at nickel processing company
AU - Irawan, Hendik
AU - Widodo, Erwin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© IEOM Society International.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - This case study was carried out to determine the economic study of the implementation of the burner unit removal project. Three investment alternatives have been developed and compared in this study to determine the most economical option, i.e. operational refractory burner system as well as current state (alternative 1), remove unit burner to ladle shop building in accordance build a new building in ladle shop building and also modify existing overhead crane (alternative 2), remove unit burner to ladle shop building in accordance build a new building in ladle shop without modifying overhead crane unit (alternative 3). Economic evaluation is studied by performing cost saving analysis, increment cash flow projection, NPV, IRR, and Payback Period. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis of the most economic option was carried out based on three investment parameters which are a projection of the operational saving cost, discounted rate, and cost of investment changes. The result shows that alternative 2 have the highest NPV, IRR, and Payback period has slightly lowest than alternative 3. In term of sensitivity analysis, alternative 2 have a big tolerance to the all of investment parameter. Therefore, this study has been successfully confirmed that alternative 2 is the most economical option.
AB - This case study was carried out to determine the economic study of the implementation of the burner unit removal project. Three investment alternatives have been developed and compared in this study to determine the most economical option, i.e. operational refractory burner system as well as current state (alternative 1), remove unit burner to ladle shop building in accordance build a new building in ladle shop building and also modify existing overhead crane (alternative 2), remove unit burner to ladle shop building in accordance build a new building in ladle shop without modifying overhead crane unit (alternative 3). Economic evaluation is studied by performing cost saving analysis, increment cash flow projection, NPV, IRR, and Payback Period. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis of the most economic option was carried out based on three investment parameters which are a projection of the operational saving cost, discounted rate, and cost of investment changes. The result shows that alternative 2 have the highest NPV, IRR, and Payback period has slightly lowest than alternative 3. In term of sensitivity analysis, alternative 2 have a big tolerance to the all of investment parameter. Therefore, this study has been successfully confirmed that alternative 2 is the most economical option.
KW - Economic Evaluation
KW - IRR
KW - NPV
KW - Payback Period
KW - Sensitivity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121122466&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85121122466
SN - 9781792361258
T3 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
SP - 1782
EP - 1788
BT - Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 2021
PB - IEOM Society
T2 - 2nd South American Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, IEOM 2021
Y2 - 5 April 2021 through 8 April 2021
ER -