TY - GEN
T1 - Evaluating GRNN, Decision Tree, and Random Forest
T2 - 5th International Conference on Big Data Analytics and Practices, IBDAP 2024
AU - Winarto, Rudy
AU - Purnomo, Mauridhi Hery
AU - Anggraeni, Wiwik
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The exhaust CO, CO2, O2, SO2, and NO gas emissions of a gas turbine-powered compressor unit under specific operating conditions are studied. Due to the high costs of hardware, maintenance, and calibration, Predictive Emissions Monitoring Systems (PEMS) is a more potential alternative to traditional CEMS for monitoring gas turbine emissions. PEMS provides a cost-effective and precise solution to traditional hardware-based emissions monitoring by employing algorithms to predict emissions. Market PEMS models use empirical approach modeling with limited data. This research explores Decision Trees and Random Forest for a new model that can handle more data of multiple inputs and output and compares its performance to the GRNN modelling approach. This study analyzed one million data points on gas turbine emissions (collected from 2021 to 2023) and found Random Forest to be the most accurate prediction method, while Decision Tree offers a good balance for smaller datasets, and Generalized Regression Neural Network (GRNN) is best for simpler data.
AB - The exhaust CO, CO2, O2, SO2, and NO gas emissions of a gas turbine-powered compressor unit under specific operating conditions are studied. Due to the high costs of hardware, maintenance, and calibration, Predictive Emissions Monitoring Systems (PEMS) is a more potential alternative to traditional CEMS for monitoring gas turbine emissions. PEMS provides a cost-effective and precise solution to traditional hardware-based emissions monitoring by employing algorithms to predict emissions. Market PEMS models use empirical approach modeling with limited data. This research explores Decision Trees and Random Forest for a new model that can handle more data of multiple inputs and output and compares its performance to the GRNN modelling approach. This study analyzed one million data points on gas turbine emissions (collected from 2021 to 2023) and found Random Forest to be the most accurate prediction method, while Decision Tree offers a good balance for smaller datasets, and Generalized Regression Neural Network (GRNN) is best for simpler data.
KW - Decision Tree
KW - Emission
KW - GRNN
KW - Prediction
KW - Random Forest
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85206579103&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/IBDAP62940.2024.10689706
DO - 10.1109/IBDAP62940.2024.10689706
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85206579103
T3 - 2024 5th International Conference on Big Data Analytics and Practices, IBDAP 2024
SP - 142
EP - 149
BT - 2024 5th International Conference on Big Data Analytics and Practices, IBDAP 2024
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Y2 - 23 August 2024 through 25 August 2024
ER -