TY - GEN
T1 - Fairness in examination timetabling
T2 - 10th International Conference on the Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling, PATAT 2014
AU - Muklason, Ahmad
AU - Parkes, Andrew J.
AU - McCollum, Barry
AU - Özcan, Ender
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© PATAT 2014 - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling. All rights reserved.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Although they have been investigated for more than two decades, university examination timetabling problems are still considered challenging and interesting problems. In our study, we are investigating student preferences for the control of the time gaps between examinations; specifically, what students consider to be best for them and also fair between students. To support this, we conducted a survey of student views and there were two main findings. Firstly, students do have concerns about “fairness within a course”, that is, fairness between students within their own course as opposed to only between students in the entire university. Secondly, they do consider some examinations harder than others and would prefer a larger time gap before such hard examinations. To account for these student preferences, we intend to extend the formulation of examination timetabling problems by modifying the objective functions, and this paper briefly describes some options. Ultimately, the aim is to automatically produce fairer examination timetables, and to increase student satisfaction.
AB - Although they have been investigated for more than two decades, university examination timetabling problems are still considered challenging and interesting problems. In our study, we are investigating student preferences for the control of the time gaps between examinations; specifically, what students consider to be best for them and also fair between students. To support this, we conducted a survey of student views and there were two main findings. Firstly, students do have concerns about “fairness within a course”, that is, fairness between students within their own course as opposed to only between students in the entire university. Secondly, they do consider some examinations harder than others and would prefer a larger time gap before such hard examinations. To account for these student preferences, we intend to extend the formulation of examination timetabling problems by modifying the objective functions, and this paper briefly describes some options. Ultimately, the aim is to automatically produce fairer examination timetables, and to increase student satisfaction.
KW - Examination Timetabling Problem
KW - Fairness
KW - Optimisation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013851354&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85013851354
T3 - PATAT 2014 - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling
SP - 512
EP - 515
BT - PATAT 2014 - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling
A2 - Ozcan, Ender
A2 - Burke, Edmund K.
A2 - McCollum, Barry
PB - PATAT
Y2 - 26 August 2014 through 29 August 2014
ER -