GLoW SMOTE-D: Oversampling Technique to Improve Prediction Model Performance of Students Failure in Courses

Susana Limanto, Joko Lianto Buliali*, Ahmad Saikhu

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The percentage of passing courses is dependent on the assistance provided to students. To ensure the effectiveness of these efforts, identifying students at risk of course failure as early as possible is crucial. The list of students at risk can be generated through academic performance prediction based on historical data. However, the number of students failing (7%) is significantly lower than the number succeeding (93%), resulting in a class imbalance that hampers performance. A widely adopted technique for addressing class imbalance issues is synthetic sample oversampling. Many oversampling techniques neglect discrete features, whereas the existing technique for discrete features treats all features uniformly and does not select samples as a basis for generating synthetic data. This limitation is capable of introducing noise and borderline samples. As a result, this study introduced a novel discrete feature oversampling technique called GLoW SMOTE-D. This technique accelerated the improvement of minority sample learning by performing multiple selections and multiple weighting in order to effectively reduce noise. Experimental results showed that this technique significantly enhanced the performance of students' failure in the course prediction model when compared to various other techniques across a range of performance measures and classifiers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8889-8901
Number of pages13
JournalIEEE Access
Volume12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Discrete
  • imbalanced dataset
  • oversampling
  • students' failure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'GLoW SMOTE-D: Oversampling Technique to Improve Prediction Model Performance of Students Failure in Courses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this