TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of Noise Level on the Accuracy of Automated Measurement of CT Number Linearity on ACR CT and Computational Phantoms
AU - Anam, Choirul
AU - Amilia, Riska
AU - Naufal, Ariij
AU - Sutanto, Heri
AU - Dwihapsari, Yanurita
AU - Fujibuchi, Toshioh
AU - Dougherty, Geoff
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering.
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - Background: Methods for segmentation, i.e., Full-segmentation (FS) and Segmentation-rotation (SR), are proposed for maintaining Computed Tomography (CT) number linearity. However, their effectiveness has not yet been tested against noise. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of noise on the accuracy of CT number linearity of the FS and SR methods on American College of Radiology (ACR) CT and computational phantoms. Material and Methods: This experimental study utilized two phantoms, ACR CT and computational phantoms. An ACR CT phantom was scanned by a 128-slice CT scanner with various tube currents from 80 to 200 mA to acquire various noises, with other constant parameters. The computational phantom was added by different Gaussian noises between 20 and 120 Hounsfield Units (HU). The CT number linearity was measured by the FS and SR methods, and the accuracy of CT number linearity was computed on two phantoms. Results: The two methods successfully segmented both phantoms at low noise, i.e., less than 60 HU. However, segmentation and measurement of CT number linearity are not accurate on a computational phantom using the FS method for more than 60-HU noise. The SR method is still accurate up to 120 HU of noise. Conclusion: The SR method outperformed the FS method to measure the CT number linearity due to its endurance in extreme noise.
AB - Background: Methods for segmentation, i.e., Full-segmentation (FS) and Segmentation-rotation (SR), are proposed for maintaining Computed Tomography (CT) number linearity. However, their effectiveness has not yet been tested against noise. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of noise on the accuracy of CT number linearity of the FS and SR methods on American College of Radiology (ACR) CT and computational phantoms. Material and Methods: This experimental study utilized two phantoms, ACR CT and computational phantoms. An ACR CT phantom was scanned by a 128-slice CT scanner with various tube currents from 80 to 200 mA to acquire various noises, with other constant parameters. The computational phantom was added by different Gaussian noises between 20 and 120 Hounsfield Units (HU). The CT number linearity was measured by the FS and SR methods, and the accuracy of CT number linearity was computed on two phantoms. Results: The two methods successfully segmented both phantoms at low noise, i.e., less than 60 HU. However, segmentation and measurement of CT number linearity are not accurate on a computational phantom using the FS method for more than 60-HU noise. The SR method is still accurate up to 120 HU of noise. Conclusion: The SR method outperformed the FS method to measure the CT number linearity due to its endurance in extreme noise.
KW - ACR CT Phantom
KW - CT Number Linearity
KW - Computational Phantom
KW - Computed Tomography Scanner
KW - Diagnostic Imaging
KW - Image Quality Enhancement
KW - Noise
KW - Quality of Health Care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166485691&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2302-1599
DO - 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2302-1599
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85166485691
SN - 2251-7200
VL - 13
SP - 353
EP - 362
JO - Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
JF - Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
IS - 4
ER -