TY - JOUR
T1 - INVESTIGATING THE COMPARISON OF SHIP RESISTANCE COMPONENTS BETWEEN U AND V-SHAPED HULLS
AU - Hakim, Muhammad Luqman
AU - Tuswan,
AU - Firdaus, Ahmad
AU - Mursid, Ocid
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Penerbit UTM Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - The selection of a hull design with minimal drag is an important effort to reduce emission levels on ships. Two different hull shapes, U and V hulls, have unique properties that affect their drag production, which has been studied extensively in the past. This study aims to re-examine the differences between the two hull types by conducting a simple analysis of drag prediction results using empirical and numerical slender body methods. Both hull models in this study have the same size and volume. The results indicate that the U hull has a higher frictional resistance (RF ) than the V hull due to its wider wetted surface area (WSA). Additionally, the viscous pressure resistance (RVP ) and form factor coefficient (K) of the U hull are also higher than those of the V hull. However, for Froude numbers (Fr) above 0.245, the U hull has lower wave resistance (RW ) than the V hull, whereas for Fr below 0.245, the U hull has higher RW . Overall, the U hull produces a higher total resistance (RT ) than the V hull at low speeds, but a lower RT at high speeds. Therefore, the choice of hull shape for minimizing a ship's resistance is influenced by the desired speed of service. If Fr is low, below 0.24, a V-shaped hull is more suitable. However, if Fr is higher than 0.24, a U-shaped hull is more appropriate.
AB - The selection of a hull design with minimal drag is an important effort to reduce emission levels on ships. Two different hull shapes, U and V hulls, have unique properties that affect their drag production, which has been studied extensively in the past. This study aims to re-examine the differences between the two hull types by conducting a simple analysis of drag prediction results using empirical and numerical slender body methods. Both hull models in this study have the same size and volume. The results indicate that the U hull has a higher frictional resistance (RF ) than the V hull due to its wider wetted surface area (WSA). Additionally, the viscous pressure resistance (RVP ) and form factor coefficient (K) of the U hull are also higher than those of the V hull. However, for Froude numbers (Fr) above 0.245, the U hull has lower wave resistance (RW ) than the V hull, whereas for Fr below 0.245, the U hull has higher RW . Overall, the U hull produces a higher total resistance (RT ) than the V hull at low speeds, but a lower RT at high speeds. Therefore, the choice of hull shape for minimizing a ship's resistance is influenced by the desired speed of service. If Fr is low, below 0.24, a V-shaped hull is more suitable. However, if Fr is higher than 0.24, a U-shaped hull is more appropriate.
KW - Formdata
KW - Hull shape
KW - U hull
KW - V hull
KW - ship resistance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159045626&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v85.19382
DO - 10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v85.19382
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85159045626
SN - 0127-9696
VL - 85
SP - 153
EP - 164
JO - Jurnal Teknologi
JF - Jurnal Teknologi
IS - 3
ER -