Is Australian Data Really Validating EGM2008, or Is EGM2008 Just in/Validating Australian Data?

S. J. Claessens, W. E. Featherstone, I. M. Anjasmara

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The tide-free release of the EGM2008 combined global geopotential model and its pre-release PGM2007A are compared with Australian land and marine gravity observations, co-located GPS-levelling on the [admittedly problematic] Australian Height Datum, astrogeodetic deflections of the vertical, and the AUSGeoid98 regional gravimetric quasigeoid model. The results show that we cannot legitimately claim to truly validate EGM2008. Instead, EGM2008 confirms already-known problems with the Australian data, as well as revealing some previously unknown problems. If one wants to claim validation, then EGM2008 is validated because it can confirm the errors in our regional data. Simply, EGM2008 is a good model over Australia.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGravity, Geoid and Earth Observation - IAG Commission 2
Subtitle of host publicationGravity Field
Pages473-479
Number of pages7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
EventIAG International Symposium on "Gravity, Geoid and Earth Observation 2008" - Chania, Crete, Germany
Duration: 23 Jun 200827 Jun 2008

Publication series

NameInternational Association of Geodesy Symposia
Volume135
ISSN (Print)0939-9585

Conference

ConferenceIAG International Symposium on "Gravity, Geoid and Earth Observation 2008"
Country/TerritoryGermany
CityChania, Crete
Period23/06/0827/06/08

Keywords

  • EGM2008
  • GPS-levelling
  • Global geopotential model
  • Gravity
  • Validation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is Australian Data Really Validating EGM2008, or Is EGM2008 Just in/Validating Australian Data?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this