TY - GEN
T1 - Lower limb musculoskeletal model validation during one legged forward hopping and side jumping in healthy subjects using EMG
AU - Wibawa, Adhi D.
AU - Verdonschot, Nico
AU - Halbertsma, Jan P.K.
AU - Burgerhof, J. G.M.
AU - Diercks, Ron L.
AU - Verkerke, G. J.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Musculoskeletal modeling is a powerful tool for analyzing human biomechanics during active movement. It has the ability to determine important kinetic data during motion such as muscle force, muscle activity and knee joint force. However, validation of these models need further study to determine the quality of their predictions. In the past, we validated the GaitLowerExtremity model (GLEM) of the AnyBody modeling system (AMS) by a series of experiments, where subjects walked normally, while their movements and EMG were measured. The movements were used by AMS to predict muscle activity, and these predictions were then compared by EMG activities. Although visual inspection showed a good comparison, quantitative comparison results were rather disappointing. We think that a more prescribed movement could result in a better comparison such as during one legged forward hopping (FH) and side jumping (SJ). In this study two variables were used to quantify muscle activity, number of onsets and offsets. The Kappa value (K) was calculated to determine the level of agreement. During FH, for all variables, 7 muscles showed a positive agreement and only one muscle showed a negative agreement. During SJ, for all variables, all muscles showed a positive agreement. This result demonstrates that during more prescribed movements, AMS predicts muscle activity much better than compared to our previous validation study during normal walking, even though some differences between AMS and EMG still did existed.
AB - Musculoskeletal modeling is a powerful tool for analyzing human biomechanics during active movement. It has the ability to determine important kinetic data during motion such as muscle force, muscle activity and knee joint force. However, validation of these models need further study to determine the quality of their predictions. In the past, we validated the GaitLowerExtremity model (GLEM) of the AnyBody modeling system (AMS) by a series of experiments, where subjects walked normally, while their movements and EMG were measured. The movements were used by AMS to predict muscle activity, and these predictions were then compared by EMG activities. Although visual inspection showed a good comparison, quantitative comparison results were rather disappointing. We think that a more prescribed movement could result in a better comparison such as during one legged forward hopping (FH) and side jumping (SJ). In this study two variables were used to quantify muscle activity, number of onsets and offsets. The Kappa value (K) was calculated to determine the level of agreement. During FH, for all variables, 7 muscles showed a positive agreement and only one muscle showed a negative agreement. During SJ, for all variables, all muscles showed a positive agreement. This result demonstrates that during more prescribed movements, AMS predicts muscle activity much better than compared to our previous validation study during normal walking, even though some differences between AMS and EMG still did existed.
KW - AnyBody Musculoskeletal System
KW - EMG
KW - Inverse dynamics analysis
KW - One legged forward hopping
KW - Side jumping
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891519858&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-642-39473-7_111
DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-39473-7_111
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84891519858
SN - 9783642394720
T3 - Communications in Computer and Information Science
SP - 557
EP - 560
BT - HCI International 2013 - Posters' Extended Abstracts - International Conference, HCI International 2013, Proceedings
PB - Springer Verlag
T2 - 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCI International 2013
Y2 - 21 July 2013 through 26 July 2013
ER -