TY - JOUR
T1 - MSEPBurr distribution
T2 - Properties and parameter estimation
AU - Choir, Achmad Syahrul
AU - Iriawan, Nur
AU - Suprih Ulama, Brodjol Sutijo
AU - Dokhi, Mohammad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 University of the Punjab.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - MSNBurr and MSTBurr distribution have been developed as Neo-Normal distributions that represent a relaxation of normality. The difference between them is that the MSTBurr's peak is below MSNBurr's. In this paper, we propose a MSEPBurr distribution with its peak could be not only lower but also high-er than MSNBurr. Furthermore, we study several properties of MSEPBurr, such as mean, variance, skewness, kurtosis, and quantile. The MSEPBurr parameters are estimated by using the Bayesian approach with the BUGS language implementation for its computation. We employ simulation study and use existing data to illustrate the application of the regression model. In real data, we notice that MSEPBurr has similar performance with MSNBurr and MSTBurr that they outperform Normal and Student-t distribution in Australian athlete data because their skewness can accommodate long left tail excellently. However, their performance is less than the Student-t model in chemical reaction rate data because their skewness can not accommodate long right tail perfectly. Although in general their perfor-mance is the same, we observe that the MSEPBurr performs better than the MSNBurr and the MSTBurr in some simulated data.
AB - MSNBurr and MSTBurr distribution have been developed as Neo-Normal distributions that represent a relaxation of normality. The difference between them is that the MSTBurr's peak is below MSNBurr's. In this paper, we propose a MSEPBurr distribution with its peak could be not only lower but also high-er than MSNBurr. Furthermore, we study several properties of MSEPBurr, such as mean, variance, skewness, kurtosis, and quantile. The MSEPBurr parameters are estimated by using the Bayesian approach with the BUGS language implementation for its computation. We employ simulation study and use existing data to illustrate the application of the regression model. In real data, we notice that MSEPBurr has similar performance with MSNBurr and MSTBurr that they outperform Normal and Student-t distribution in Australian athlete data because their skewness can accommodate long left tail excellently. However, their performance is less than the Student-t model in chemical reaction rate data because their skewness can not accommodate long right tail perfectly. Although in general their perfor-mance is the same, we observe that the MSEPBurr performs better than the MSNBurr and the MSTBurr in some simulated data.
KW - Bayesian
KW - Distribution
KW - MSEPBurr
KW - MSNBurr
KW - MSTBurr
KW - Normal relaxation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064568054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.18187/pjsor.v15i1.2291
DO - 10.18187/pjsor.v15i1.2291
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85064568054
SN - 1816-2711
VL - 15
SP - 179
EP - 193
JO - Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research
JF - Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research
IS - 1
ER -