TY - JOUR
T1 - Multiresponse surface methodology to optimize the tablet's quality characteristics
AU - Sylvi, P.
AU - Purhadi,
AU - Fithriasari, K.
AU - Sutikno,
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.
PY - 2019/4/9
Y1 - 2019/4/9
N2 - Response surface methodology is able to find the setting for input variables that optimize the response. When there is more than one response, the multiresponse surface methodology is used. To optimize these responses simultaneously, especially for quality characteristics, a hybrid method of Fuzzy Goal Programming (FGP) - Genetic Algorithm (GA) can accommodate it. In this research, the tablet's quality characteristics are the level of hardness, the level of friability, and the disintegration time of the tablet. The input variables that are considered to have a significant effect on the quality characteristics of the tablet are levels of binding agents, disintegrants, and the ma-chine pressure on compression process. The use of FGP is based on the reason that this method provides flexibility especially when objective functions and constraints cannot be clearly defined, thus requiring fuzzy numbers as operators. This advantage is not owned by the basic method of common Goal Programming (GP). The use of GA is to find a global optimum solution because it implements a ran-dom system.
AB - Response surface methodology is able to find the setting for input variables that optimize the response. When there is more than one response, the multiresponse surface methodology is used. To optimize these responses simultaneously, especially for quality characteristics, a hybrid method of Fuzzy Goal Programming (FGP) - Genetic Algorithm (GA) can accommodate it. In this research, the tablet's quality characteristics are the level of hardness, the level of friability, and the disintegration time of the tablet. The input variables that are considered to have a significant effect on the quality characteristics of the tablet are levels of binding agents, disintegrants, and the ma-chine pressure on compression process. The use of FGP is based on the reason that this method provides flexibility especially when objective functions and constraints cannot be clearly defined, thus requiring fuzzy numbers as operators. This advantage is not owned by the basic method of common Goal Programming (GP). The use of GA is to find a global optimum solution because it implements a ran-dom system.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064869832&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/1755-1315/243/1/012045
DO - 10.1088/1755-1315/243/1/012045
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85064869832
SN - 1755-1307
VL - 243
JO - IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
JF - IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
IS - 1
M1 - 012045
T2 - 1st International Conference on Environmental Geography and Geography Education, ICEGE 2018
Y2 - 17 November 2018 through 18 November 2018
ER -