TY - JOUR
T1 - Parametric studies on the ductility of axial loaded square reinforced concrete column made of normal-strength concrete (NSC) and high-strength steel confining rebar (HSSCR) with various ties configuration
AU - Ulfa, Anis Aulia
AU - Piscesa, Bambang
AU - Attard, Mario M.
AU - Faimun, Faimun
AU - Aji, Pujo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors, published by EDP Sciences.
PY - 2020/3/13
Y1 - 2020/3/13
N2 - During an earthquake, Reinforced Concrete (RC) building structures should behave in a ductile manner to prevent the structures from collapse. Therefore, the column element should have sufficient ductility to sustain an axial load at the post-peak region. Ductility of the RC column can be sufficiently provided by confinement to the RC column core. Therefore, in this paper, ductility of square RC columns made of NSC and HSSCR are analyzed using three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis (3D-NLFEA) with various ties configurations. In total, 12 specimens for each transverse steel rebar configuration were examined. The measurement used for ductility comparisons is the I10 index (AS 3600-2018) which is compared with the concept of ductility available in the literature (for example ACI 318-14). The study found that the computed minimum transverse steel rebar diameter based on ACI 318-14 showed larger diameter than the AS 3600:2018. From the 3DNLFEA analysis found that using a confining rebar higher than 700 MPa with the same volumetric ratio shows lower ductility for the Type I RC column configuration.
AB - During an earthquake, Reinforced Concrete (RC) building structures should behave in a ductile manner to prevent the structures from collapse. Therefore, the column element should have sufficient ductility to sustain an axial load at the post-peak region. Ductility of the RC column can be sufficiently provided by confinement to the RC column core. Therefore, in this paper, ductility of square RC columns made of NSC and HSSCR are analyzed using three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis (3D-NLFEA) with various ties configurations. In total, 12 specimens for each transverse steel rebar configuration were examined. The measurement used for ductility comparisons is the I10 index (AS 3600-2018) which is compared with the concept of ductility available in the literature (for example ACI 318-14). The study found that the computed minimum transverse steel rebar diameter based on ACI 318-14 showed larger diameter than the AS 3600:2018. From the 3DNLFEA analysis found that using a confining rebar higher than 700 MPa with the same volumetric ratio shows lower ductility for the Type I RC column configuration.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082577382&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1051/e3sconf/202015603002
DO - 10.1051/e3sconf/202015603002
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85082577382
SN - 2267-1242
VL - 156
JO - E3S Web of Conferences
JF - E3S Web of Conferences
M1 - 03002
T2 - 4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Disaster Mitigation, ICEEDM 2019
Y2 - 25 September 2019 through 27 September 2019
ER -