TY - GEN
T1 - Performance Comparative of AODV, AOMDV and DSDV Routing Protocols in MANET Using NS2
AU - Alamsyah,
AU - Setijadi, Eko
AU - Purnama, I. Ketut Eddy
AU - Hery Pumomo, Mauridhi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 IEEE.
PY - 2018/11/27
Y1 - 2018/11/27
N2 - Mobile ad hoc network (MANET) is a network that has fast characteristics, efficient deployment, and can apply in an emergency location such as natural disasters, military operations, forest fires, and health monitoring. However, the challenges and problems facing MANET are dynamic topology changes, with no fixed infrastructure, and limited energy sources. Dynamic topology changes will result in redundant data packets on each node, and the quality of the network will decrease. To overcome problems in MANET then selection of routing protocol is essential in improving network quality. This study aims to compare the performance of AODV, AOMDV, and DSDV routing protocols based quality of service (QoS). Parameters QoS to be analyzed are packet delivery ratio (PDR), packet loss, throughput, delay, and routing overhead (RO). The simulation result using NS-2 shows that AOMDV performs better than AODV and DSDV regarding PDR. AODV performs better than AOMD and DSDV regarding throughput, RO. While DSDV performs has better than AODV and AOMDV regarding the delay.
AB - Mobile ad hoc network (MANET) is a network that has fast characteristics, efficient deployment, and can apply in an emergency location such as natural disasters, military operations, forest fires, and health monitoring. However, the challenges and problems facing MANET are dynamic topology changes, with no fixed infrastructure, and limited energy sources. Dynamic topology changes will result in redundant data packets on each node, and the quality of the network will decrease. To overcome problems in MANET then selection of routing protocol is essential in improving network quality. This study aims to compare the performance of AODV, AOMDV, and DSDV routing protocols based quality of service (QoS). Parameters QoS to be analyzed are packet delivery ratio (PDR), packet loss, throughput, delay, and routing overhead (RO). The simulation result using NS-2 shows that AOMDV performs better than AODV and DSDV regarding PDR. AODV performs better than AOMD and DSDV regarding throughput, RO. While DSDV performs has better than AODV and AOMDV regarding the delay.
KW - AODV
KW - AOMDV
KW - DSDV
KW - MANET
KW - QoS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060061988&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ISEMANTIC.2018.8549794
DO - 10.1109/ISEMANTIC.2018.8549794
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85060061988
T3 - Proceedings - 2018 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication: Creative Technology for Human Life, iSemantic 2018
SP - 286
EP - 289
BT - Proceedings - 2018 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 3rd International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication, iSemantic 2018
Y2 - 21 September 2018 through 22 September 2018
ER -