TY - GEN
T1 - Performance Comparison of Optimization Algorithms for Shortest Path Determination on Facial Edge Coordinates
AU - Nurkholik, Zen
AU - Mardiyanto, Ronny
AU - Purwanto, Djoko
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 IEEE.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Optimization is a computational process to find the best solution by minimizing or maximizing an objective function. This research compares the performance of three optimization algorithms Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Simulated Annealing (SA) in determining the shortest path optimization between coordinate points extracted from detected facial edge images. Using the Canny edge detection method, 10 single facial images with a resolution of 120 x 120 pixels were processed to produce (X, Y) coordinates as input for the optimization process. The results show that GA consistently outperforms the other methods, achieving the shortest total distance in 9 out of 10 datasets. The results of the first image data comparison, the GA method produced the shortest total distance with a value of 18,199.59 pixels, while (SA) 21,072.28 pixels had a performance 15.78% worse than GA, and (PSO) 28,381.58 (pixels) showed a performance 55.94% worse than GA. SA showed competitive and optimal results in one dataset, while PSO consistently provided the longest distance, indicating its lower efficiency in this research.
AB - Optimization is a computational process to find the best solution by minimizing or maximizing an objective function. This research compares the performance of three optimization algorithms Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Simulated Annealing (SA) in determining the shortest path optimization between coordinate points extracted from detected facial edge images. Using the Canny edge detection method, 10 single facial images with a resolution of 120 x 120 pixels were processed to produce (X, Y) coordinates as input for the optimization process. The results show that GA consistently outperforms the other methods, achieving the shortest total distance in 9 out of 10 datasets. The results of the first image data comparison, the GA method produced the shortest total distance with a value of 18,199.59 pixels, while (SA) 21,072.28 pixels had a performance 15.78% worse than GA, and (PSO) 28,381.58 (pixels) showed a performance 55.94% worse than GA. SA showed competitive and optimal results in one dataset, while PSO consistently provided the longest distance, indicating its lower efficiency in this research.
KW - Canny edge detection
KW - Distance optimization
KW - Image processing
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105010019856
U2 - 10.1109/ICoCSETI63724.2025.11019269
DO - 10.1109/ICoCSETI63724.2025.11019269
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105010019856
T3 - ICoCSETI 2025 - International Conference on Computer Sciences, Engineering, and Technology Innovation, Proceeding
SP - 606
EP - 611
BT - ICoCSETI 2025 - International Conference on Computer Sciences, Engineering, and Technology Innovation, Proceeding
A2 - Wibowo, Ferry Wahyu
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2025 International Conference on Computer Sciences, Engineering, and Technology Innovation, ICoCSETI 2025
Y2 - 21 January 2025
ER -