TY - JOUR
T1 - Pressure effect in supercritical CO2 extraction of plant seeds
AU - Machmudah, Siti
AU - Kondo, Mikako
AU - Sasaki, Mitsuru
AU - Goto, Motonobu
AU - Munemasa, Jun
AU - Yamagata, Masahiro
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was partly supported by Kumamoto University 21st century COE Program “Pulsed Power Science”.
PY - 2008/4
Y1 - 2008/4
N2 - Effect of pressure on supercritical carbon dioxide extraction from various seeds was studied. Three kinds of seeds (rosehip, loquat and physic nut) were used as materials. Extraction was conducted at constant temperature (40, 60 and 80 °C), at CO2 flow rate of 3 ml/min and at various pressures (15-9 MPa). Recovery of extract was compared with soxhlet extraction recovery using hexane as solvent. Based on results at constant temperature, the recovery of rosehip seed oil increased with increasing pressure at short extraction time, but decreased as extraction time progressed. Compared with soxhlet extraction, SC-CO2 extraction could extract more rosehip oil higher than soxhlet extraction using hexane. In the extraction of rosehip seed oil, the cross-over region was observed. The recovery of loquat seed oil increased with decreasing pressure at 60 and 80 °C, but at 40 °C, extraction recovery was independent of the pressure. For physic nut, increasing pressure allowed high extraction recovery from 83.7 to 88.7% at constant temperature. However, the SC-CO2 extraction could not completely extract oil from physic nut seeds compared with soxhlet extraction using hexane. The experimental results could be described using two simple models, the partitioning KD model and a two-site kinetic model. The two-site kinetic model applied well at higher pressure compared whereas the KD model failed to correlate the data at high pressure.
AB - Effect of pressure on supercritical carbon dioxide extraction from various seeds was studied. Three kinds of seeds (rosehip, loquat and physic nut) were used as materials. Extraction was conducted at constant temperature (40, 60 and 80 °C), at CO2 flow rate of 3 ml/min and at various pressures (15-9 MPa). Recovery of extract was compared with soxhlet extraction recovery using hexane as solvent. Based on results at constant temperature, the recovery of rosehip seed oil increased with increasing pressure at short extraction time, but decreased as extraction time progressed. Compared with soxhlet extraction, SC-CO2 extraction could extract more rosehip oil higher than soxhlet extraction using hexane. In the extraction of rosehip seed oil, the cross-over region was observed. The recovery of loquat seed oil increased with decreasing pressure at 60 and 80 °C, but at 40 °C, extraction recovery was independent of the pressure. For physic nut, increasing pressure allowed high extraction recovery from 83.7 to 88.7% at constant temperature. However, the SC-CO2 extraction could not completely extract oil from physic nut seeds compared with soxhlet extraction using hexane. The experimental results could be described using two simple models, the partitioning KD model and a two-site kinetic model. The two-site kinetic model applied well at higher pressure compared whereas the KD model failed to correlate the data at high pressure.
KW - Loquat seed
KW - Physic nut
KW - Pressure effect
KW - Rosehip seed
KW - Supercritical CO extraction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40049092736&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.supflu.2007.09.024
DO - 10.1016/j.supflu.2007.09.024
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:40049092736
SN - 0896-8446
VL - 44
SP - 301
EP - 307
JO - Journal of Supercritical Fluids
JF - Journal of Supercritical Fluids
IS - 3
ER -