TY - GEN
T1 - Project Management Ticket Category Classification Using Machine Learning Method
T2 - 2024 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Mechatronics System, AIMS 2024
AU - Alekhine, Julius
AU - Anggraini, Ratih Nur Esti
AU - Sarno, Riyanarto
AU - Septiyanto, Abullah Faqih
AU - Haryono, Agus Tri
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - JIRA Software is used to monitor projects and track errors or bugs. Generally, JIRA tickets issued by the operational team consists of 2: EI tickets to report any issues and EACR tickets intended for enhancements or developing new report requesting by clients. However, in its usage, there is often mistakes made in classifying JIRA tickets, which impacts the quality and time delivery to clients. It can be ascertained that the errors were solely human errors, not system errors. To predict categorization errors, we have attempted to apply machine learning using several classifiers and compare the results. From various literature studies, we have tried the 6 most commonly used classifiers for classification and prediction purposes. The classifiers we used are: Multinomial Naive Bayes, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Extra Trees. Meanwhile, the training and test data comparison was set at a ratio of 70:30. The valuation score from the experiment shows that among other classifier, the Extra Trees classifier produces the highest level of accuracy, F1 score, and recall with values of 0.9950, 0.9950, and 0.9899 respectively. To improve the classifier predictive accuracy, we proposed Extra Trees parameter adjustment.
AB - JIRA Software is used to monitor projects and track errors or bugs. Generally, JIRA tickets issued by the operational team consists of 2: EI tickets to report any issues and EACR tickets intended for enhancements or developing new report requesting by clients. However, in its usage, there is often mistakes made in classifying JIRA tickets, which impacts the quality and time delivery to clients. It can be ascertained that the errors were solely human errors, not system errors. To predict categorization errors, we have attempted to apply machine learning using several classifiers and compare the results. From various literature studies, we have tried the 6 most commonly used classifiers for classification and prediction purposes. The classifiers we used are: Multinomial Naive Bayes, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Extra Trees. Meanwhile, the training and test data comparison was set at a ratio of 70:30. The valuation score from the experiment shows that among other classifier, the Extra Trees classifier produces the highest level of accuracy, F1 score, and recall with values of 0.9950, 0.9950, and 0.9899 respectively. To improve the classifier predictive accuracy, we proposed Extra Trees parameter adjustment.
KW - JIRA
KW - machine learning,Extra Trees
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193850601&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/AIMS61812.2024.10512660
DO - 10.1109/AIMS61812.2024.10512660
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85193850601
T3 - International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Mechatronics System, AIMS 2024
BT - International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Mechatronics System, AIMS 2024
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Y2 - 22 February 2024 through 23 February 2024
ER -